A manga-style comic series exposing how bureaucracy became the weapon. Based on real events, this series visualizes the erasure of a trans woman through healthcare profiling, police escalation, and digital surveillance.
Comic #1 – Initial Flagging / Surveillance Begins

Comic #2 – “Concern” Disguised as Protocol

Comic #3 – Escalation Without Evidence

Comic #4 – Metadata Weaponization

Comic #5 – The Call That Changed Everything

Comic #6 – Systemic Silence, Strategic Disclosure

Comic #7 – AI as the Mirror

Comic #8 – Paperwork is the Weapon

Comic #9 – Plaintiff vs. Goliath, the Legal Battle Begins

📄 Download the Full FINAL NOTICE Email (PDF)
🔗 View or Download the FINAL NOTICE on Google Drive 🔗 Source PDF (Publicly Shareable): Blocked Email Response PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I1IVxjbQwGb_xSytM6wSZX-M71anzh1y/view

🚨 THIS IS YOUR FINAL WARNING.....Then UHC/UHG BLOCKED MY EMAILS!

UnitedHealth Group Inc. is now named in the finalized lawsuit. You have failed to engage, respond, or acknowledge service of a legally protected Rule 403/408 settlement offer delivered on July 4, 2025.

Your collective silence was not negligence—it was strategic. You chose silence to intimidate. You assumed I would fold.

I didn’t. And now the cost of your gamble is about to hit.

🔐 ACCESS REVOKED As of this message, you have permanently lost access to the shared Rule 408 exhibit folder. If you failed to make copies, that is your consequence for choosing ghost tactics over resolution. You were warned. You did nothing. You don’t get a second chance.

📉 NARRATIVE CONTROL HAS SHIFTED AdministrativeErasure.org now ranks above UnitedHealthcare on Google for:

“UnitedHealthcare HIPAA violation”

“UHC metadata surveillance”

“Trans patient PHI police disclosure”

This is with pre-launch traffic only. Once I drop Exhibit Z, your search visibility on misconduct-related terms will drown in documented shame. You will not claw it back with PR. You do not own this narrative anymore. I do.

📂 FILING IS IMMINENT But you don’t know what that word means—now do you? You used “imminent threat” to justify violating HIPAA... Thirty-five days after I last contacted you. Not imminent. Not emergency. Just retaliatory.

You redefined "imminent" the same way you redefined "care." Now I’m redefining "consequences."

The complaint includes:

HIPAA violations under 45 C.F.R. §§ 164.502(a), 164.512(f), 164.512(j), 164.514(d)

PHI disclosure 35 days after last contact, with no warrant, no subpoena, and no emergency

Weaponization of call metadata and voice profiling

Escalation to Department of Homeland Security before contacting police

Criminalization of a distressed trans Medicaid patient after lawful hormone refill requests

Attached Exhibits: N, O, AA, Z — all timestamped, hash-verified, and whistleblower-supported

🔎 DISCOVERY WILL RIP OPEN YOUR SYSTEMS Select highlights from the 443-point demand set (PDF already in record):

RFP #135 – Internal escalation logs, behavioral flags, and metadata tags used to label me a “threat”

RFP #136 – Session logs from AI/compliance dashboards that evaluated my recordings Dec 10–14, 2024

RFP #137 – Internal messages referencing “Deny. Defend. Depose.” or DHS handoff planning

INT #102–104 – Who classified me, why clinical protocol was bypassed, who received the final risk memo

RFA #133–135 – Admit profiling occurred before clinical review. Admit federal referral documents were authored.

You will be deposed. Your logs will be audited. Your systems will be interrogated under oath.

📣 YOU WILL NOT OUTRUN THE RELEASE – MEDIA DETONATION IS INEVITABLE When this goes live, it won’t trickle—it will detonate.

My exposé and all attached exhibits will be released through a coordinated cross-platform media campaign, including:

Reddit (r/HealthInsurance, r/Privacy, r/LGBT, r/LegalAdvice, r/UnitedHealthcare)

Facebook (public page, activist groups, Stories, Reels, timed reposts)

Twitter / X (tagging civil rights attorneys, journalists, and trans advocates)

Instagram (graphics, voice-over videos, timelines)

YouTube & Shorts (captioned testimony clips, public accountability edits)

Threads, Mastodon, Tumblr, Lemmy (syndicated advocacy reach)

Email blasts to:

LGBTQ+ orgs: GLAAD, HRC, Translash, NCTE, Autostraddle, Black & Pink

Legal media: ProPublica, Law360, The Intercept, Courthouse News

Local and national TV stations (Denver, Grand Junction, and beyond)

This is not a social post. It is a digital civil rights autopsy—with timestamps and evidence hashes.

📛 EVERYTHING WILL BE PUBLIC I am no longer honoring confidentiality. You’ve demonstrated that secrecy only protects you, not the truth.

I will be publishing:

This email chain

Your silence

Your metadata trails

Every undisputed quote, tag, and escalation log

No protective order will shield you from public accountability. I tried transparency. You weaponized it.

Now I return the favor—with amplification.

🩸 THIS IS NOT ABOUT FUNDING ME This is about legal precedent and community protection.

You tried to erase a trans survivor by reframing lawful advocacy as instability. You criminalized distress. You gambled on silence.

You lost.

You have until when I originally stated in the Rule 408 offer to initiate formal settlement contact. Oh, you don’t know when that was? Because you didn’t open the email? Because you didn’t respond?

OH FUCKING WELL. I DON’T GIVE A FUCK. You lost my courtesy. You lost the shield of silence. You lose control now.

Otherwise, I will file. I will publish. And your internal systems will be laid bare. You’ll figure it out in the courtroom—or on Google. You were given a chance. You intentionally failed.

There will be no further notice. Only discovery. And public memory.

⚖️ Pro Se Does Not Mean Incompetent It means unrestrained. It means I have nothing to lose—no pension to protect, no firm to answer to, no partners to calm down.

I am free to speak, free to publish, and free to destroy a Fortune 500 from the outside in.

You can spend $10 million on defense, discovery, crisis PR, and executive damage control. But you’ll never collect a dollar from me. If somehow—against all odds and truth—you were to win a judgment? I’ll bankrupt it before you see a cent.

Because this isn’t about money. This is about legacy, precedent, and truth in the face of corporate erasure.

You thought pro se meant I was unarmed. What it really means is: I’m untouchable.

Samara Dorn Pro Se Plaintiff 📧 samaraislost@gmail.com 📧 samara@AdministrativeErasure.org 🌐 https://AdministrativeErasure.org 📱 970.316.3020 (Text Only)

🔗 READ MORE LINKS (with anchor text) Use the following in your website post:

📖 Read More: 🔗 Administrative Genocide: Trump’s Blueprint for Erasing Trans Lives How surveillance and policy sabotage erased trans lives long before courtrooms ever saw them.

📖 Read More: 🔗 The 35-Day Myth of Imminent Threat They claimed “imminent danger.” Then waited 35 days. This wasn’t a rescue. It was retaliation.

📖 Read More: 🔗 Systemic Denial After Surgery: A Survivor’s Report Post-op sabotage. Insurance denials. Bottom surgery. And the crash they caused on purpose.

This is not a closing. This is a charge.
In this final statement, Samara Dorn doesn’t just summarize a case—she detonates it.
The courtroom was silent. The algorithms weren’t.

Listen now. Hear what they tried to bury.
(Also features excerpts from THE AI HATERS REBUTTAL.)

☢️ Closing Statement – Dorn v. UnitedHealthcare

This is not a conclusion—it’s ignition. Samara Dorn delivers a final blow in the battle against healthcare profiling, metadata weaponization, and transgender erasure. This statement is part of the broader narrative, also featured in THE AI HATERS REBUTTAL.

🎧 Listen to the Opening Statement in Webamp Player

📄 Below is the actual transcript from the Complaint

• Opening Statement: pages 2–4
• Closing Statement: pages 146–148

---

📢 OPENING STATEMENT

“What is done cannot be undone, but one can prevent it happening again.” — Anne Frank.

“My silence will not protect me.” — Audre Lorde.

“On the first day, we will revoke Joe Biden’s cruel policies on transgender treatments...” — Donald J. Trump, October 16, 2024.

“Gender ideology is a cult...” — Senator J.D. Vance, March 2024.

This is not a privacy case. This is not a civil dispute. This is a reckoning.

The Defendants—UnitedHealthcare of Colorado, Inc. and Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization, Inc.—knowingly and unlawfully disclosed the Plaintiff’s PHI to law enforcement without a warrant, subpoena, or HIPAA-authorized exception.

What did they hand over? Her gender identity. Her surgical history. Her psychiatric diagnoses. Her medications. Audio recordings of her lawful but distressed calls. And most chilling of all—their own narrative framing her as a national security threat.

They invoked Homeland Security. When that failed, they turned to the Grand Junction Police Department.

Why? Because she said three words—“Deny. Defend. Depose.”—a legal critique, twisted into a threat. They fabricated meaning. They gave police the script. They turned protected speech into surveillance. They didn’t wait for a judge. This wasn’t a glitch. It was policy in action.

They did this knowing the political climate: A presidential frontrunner calling for trans erasure. A culture of fear. And instead of resisting, they complied. They helped.

The First Amendment doesn’t require politeness. It protects protest.
The Fourth doesn’t excuse profiling. It prohibits warrantless search and seizure.
The Fourteenth doesn’t allow discrimination. It guarantees equal protection.

This wasn’t just illegal. It was a message—to every other trans person:

Don’t raise your voice. Or we’ll disappear you, too.

Surveillance becomes isolation. Isolation becomes disappearance. Disappearance becomes death.

Gulags began with clerks. Gas chambers began with intake forms. Genocide begins with paperwork.

And genocide always—always—begins with bureaucrats doing their job.

“How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world.” — Anne Frank

This complaint is that moment.

This is not just legal. This is moral.
This is a declaration: We will not be flagged. We will not be profiled. We will not be erased.

Her records were hers. Her voice was hers. Her truth is still here.

The Plaintiff survived. She speaks. And she is not alone.

---

⚖️ CLOSING STATEMENT

There is no justice in waiting 35 days to reframe a medication request into a threat profile. There is no emergency. There was no escalation. No clinical call. Just strategic silence—and then retaliation.

Their own employee admitted it: “I’m not supposed to do this…”

And yet she did. She hit send. 35 days after the fact.

No crisis. No urgency. Just a calculated delivery of a packet to the police: audio files, identity, meds, surgical history—packaged with a quote: “I kinda mean what I say.”

That sentence—uttered in desperation, not violence—has become their excuse.

But it wasn’t a threat. It was a cry for help.

And they knew it. Because they sat on it for 35 days. Debated liability. And still chose erasure.

This wasn’t care. It was a bureaucratic hit job.

They punished speech. Criminalized gender. Created a false police record. And hoped the Plaintiff would disappear before this lawsuit could ever be filed.

But she didn’t.

She stood up. She filed. And she forced them to face what they did.

This Court is not just about contracts. It is the firewall against administrative cruelty disguised as care.

Five calls. Thirty-five days of silence. One irrevocable breach.

The law must mean more than permission to harm. It must mean protection for the already harmed.

This is not a closing. This is a charge.
In this final statement, Samara Dorn doesn’t just summarize a case—she detonates it.
The courtroom was silent. The algorithms weren’t.

Listen now. Hear what they tried to bury.
(Also features excerpts from THE AI HATERS REBUTTAL.)

☢️ Closing Statement – Dorn v. UnitedHealthcare

This is not a conclusion—it’s ignition. Samara Dorn delivers a final blow in the battle against healthcare profiling, metadata weaponization, and transgender erasure. This statement is part of the broader narrative, also featured in THE AI HATERS REBUTTAL.

🎧 Listen to the Opening Statement in Webamp Player

📄 Below is the actual transcript from the Complaint

• Opening Statement: pages 2–4
• Closing Statement: pages 146–148

---

📢 OPENING STATEMENT

“What is done cannot be undone, but one can prevent it happening again.” — Anne Frank.

“My silence will not protect me.” — Audre Lorde.

“On the first day, we will revoke Joe Biden’s cruel policies on transgender treatments...” — Donald J. Trump, October 16, 2024.

“Gender ideology is a cult...” — Senator J.D. Vance, March 2024.

This is not a privacy case. This is not a civil dispute. This is a reckoning.

The Defendants—UnitedHealthcare of Colorado, Inc. and Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization, Inc.—knowingly and unlawfully disclosed the Plaintiff’s PHI to law enforcement without a warrant, subpoena, or HIPAA-authorized exception.

What did they hand over? Her gender identity. Her surgical history. Her psychiatric diagnoses. Her medications. Audio recordings of her lawful but distressed calls. And most chilling of all—their own narrative framing her as a national security threat.

They invoked Homeland Security. When that failed, they turned to the Grand Junction Police Department.

Why? Because she said three words—“Deny. Defend. Depose.”—a legal critique, twisted into a threat. They fabricated meaning. They gave police the script. They turned protected speech into surveillance. They didn’t wait for a judge. This wasn’t a glitch. It was policy in action.

They did this knowing the political climate: A presidential frontrunner calling for trans erasure. A culture of fear. And instead of resisting, they complied. They helped.

The First Amendment doesn’t require politeness. It protects protest.
The Fourth doesn’t excuse profiling. It prohibits warrantless search and seizure.
The Fourteenth doesn’t allow discrimination. It guarantees equal protection.

This wasn’t just illegal. It was a message—to every other trans person:

Don’t raise your voice. Or we’ll disappear you, too.

Surveillance becomes isolation. Isolation becomes disappearance. Disappearance becomes death.

Gulags began with clerks. Gas chambers began with intake forms. Genocide begins with paperwork.

And genocide always—always—begins with bureaucrats doing their job.

“How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world.” — Anne Frank

This complaint is that moment.

This is not just legal. This is moral.
This is a declaration: We will not be flagged. We will not be profiled. We will not be erased.

Her records were hers. Her voice was hers. Her truth is still here.

The Plaintiff survived. She speaks. And she is not alone.

---

⚖️ CLOSING STATEMENT

There is no justice in waiting 35 days to reframe a medication request into a threat profile. There is no emergency. There was no escalation. No clinical call. Just strategic silence—and then retaliation.

Their own employee admitted it: “I’m not supposed to do this…”

And yet she did. She hit send. 35 days after the fact.

No crisis. No urgency. Just a calculated delivery of a packet to the police: audio files, identity, meds, surgical history—packaged with a quote: “I kinda mean what I say.”

That sentence—uttered in desperation, not violence—has become their excuse.

But it wasn’t a threat. It was a cry for help.

And they knew it. Because they sat on it for 35 days. Debated liability. And still chose erasure.

This wasn’t care. It was a bureaucratic hit job.

They punished speech. Criminalized gender. Created a false police record. And hoped the Plaintiff would disappear before this lawsuit could ever be filed.

But she didn’t.

She stood up. She filed. And she forced them to face what they did.

This Court is not just about contracts. It is the firewall against administrative cruelty disguised as care.

Five calls. Thirty-five days of silence. One irrevocable breach.

The law must mean more than permission to harm. It must mean protection for the already harmed.

🧑‍⚖️ I asked for a simulated review from one of the sharpest constitutional minds in the country—Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, UC Berkeley Law. Here’s what a full legal review in his voice might look like, evaluating my civil rights complaint against UnitedHealthcare.

The conclusion?
“One of the most significant civil rights records of the decade.”

This is the legal blueprint of administrative erasure. And it’s just getting started.

👉 Click to view PDF