Opening and Closing Statement – Dorn v. UCH,et. al. (Also Fet. AI Haters Rebuttal)

This is not a closing. This is a charge.
In this final statement, Samara Dorn doesn’t just summarize a case—she detonates it.
The courtroom was silent. The algorithms weren’t.

Listen now. Hear what they tried to bury.
(Also features excerpts from THE AI HATERS REBUTTAL.)

☢️ Closing Statement – Dorn v. UnitedHealthcare

This is not a conclusion—it’s ignition. Samara Dorn delivers a final blow in the battle against healthcare profiling, metadata weaponization, and transgender erasure. This statement is part of the broader narrative, also featured in THE AI HATERS REBUTTAL.

🎧 Listen to the Opening Statement in Webamp Player

📄 Below is the actual transcript from the Complaint

• Opening Statement: pages 2–4
• Closing Statement: pages 146–148

---

📢 OPENING STATEMENT

“What is done cannot be undone, but one can prevent it happening again.” — Anne Frank.

“My silence will not protect me.” — Audre Lorde.

“On the first day, we will revoke Joe Biden’s cruel policies on transgender treatments...” — Donald J. Trump, October 16, 2024.

“Gender ideology is a cult...” — Senator J.D. Vance, March 2024.

This is not a privacy case. This is not a civil dispute. This is a reckoning.

The Defendants—UnitedHealthcare of Colorado, Inc. and Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization, Inc.—knowingly and unlawfully disclosed the Plaintiff’s PHI to law enforcement without a warrant, subpoena, or HIPAA-authorized exception.

What did they hand over? Her gender identity. Her surgical history. Her psychiatric diagnoses. Her medications. Audio recordings of her lawful but distressed calls. And most chilling of all—their own narrative framing her as a national security threat.

They invoked Homeland Security. When that failed, they turned to the Grand Junction Police Department.

Why? Because she said three words—“Deny. Defend. Depose.”—a legal critique, twisted into a threat. They fabricated meaning. They gave police the script. They turned protected speech into surveillance. They didn’t wait for a judge. This wasn’t a glitch. It was policy in action.

They did this knowing the political climate: A presidential frontrunner calling for trans erasure. A culture of fear. And instead of resisting, they complied. They helped.

The First Amendment doesn’t require politeness. It protects protest.
The Fourth doesn’t excuse profiling. It prohibits warrantless search and seizure.
The Fourteenth doesn’t allow discrimination. It guarantees equal protection.

This wasn’t just illegal. It was a message—to every other trans person:

Don’t raise your voice. Or we’ll disappear you, too.

Surveillance becomes isolation. Isolation becomes disappearance. Disappearance becomes death.

Gulags began with clerks. Gas chambers began with intake forms. Genocide begins with paperwork.

And genocide always—always—begins with bureaucrats doing their job.

“How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world.” — Anne Frank

This complaint is that moment.

This is not just legal. This is moral.
This is a declaration: We will not be flagged. We will not be profiled. We will not be erased.

Her records were hers. Her voice was hers. Her truth is still here.

The Plaintiff survived. She speaks. And she is not alone.

---

⚖️ CLOSING STATEMENT

There is no justice in waiting 35 days to reframe a medication request into a threat profile. There is no emergency. There was no escalation. No clinical call. Just strategic silence—and then retaliation.

Their own employee admitted it: “I’m not supposed to do this…”

And yet she did. She hit send. 35 days after the fact.

No crisis. No urgency. Just a calculated delivery of a packet to the police: audio files, identity, meds, surgical history—packaged with a quote: “I kinda mean what I say.”

That sentence—uttered in desperation, not violence—has become their excuse.

But it wasn’t a threat. It was a cry for help.

And they knew it. Because they sat on it for 35 days. Debated liability. And still chose erasure.

This wasn’t care. It was a bureaucratic hit job.

They punished speech. Criminalized gender. Created a false police record. And hoped the Plaintiff would disappear before this lawsuit could ever be filed.

But she didn’t.

She stood up. She filed. And she forced them to face what they did.

This Court is not just about contracts. It is the firewall against administrative cruelty disguised as care.

Five calls. Thirty-five days of silence. One irrevocable breach.

The law must mean more than permission to harm. It must mean protection for the already harmed.