Contact Us – Share Your Story or Reach Out

✉️ Contact Us

We don't believe in silence. We believe in testimony, accountability, and truth — even when institutions try to disappear it.

This site was built from pain. If you've felt erased by insurance systems, profiled by AI, threatened for your identity, or silenced for asking too many questions, you are not alone. We hear you. We believe in corporate and government accountability. We are not afraid.

If you have questions, media inquiries, legal interest, or want to share your own story of administrative erasure, reach out:

📬 Email samara@AdministrativeErasure.org All messages go directly to the site's founder. Expect a human reply—not a system.

📣 Press & Media Journalists, researchers, and civil rights allies: 💡 Include “PRESS” in your subject line for priority handling.

🕵️ Whistleblowers 💥 If you have information about healthcare surveillance, AI escalation systems, or data misuse inside institutions like UnitedHealthcare, you are welcome here. You can email securely or request a Signal contact for encrypted messaging.

🌱 Survivors & Community If you're a trans person, Medicaid recipient, or marginalized community member affected by healthcare injustice, this platform is for you. You're not alone—and you deserve more than silence. ✊🏽

🚨 Legal Inquiries Law firms or watchdog groups wishing to review exhibits, metadata, or case materials may request access by email. 🗃️ Include “LEGAL REVIEW REQUEST” in your subject line.

📌 Note This site does not currently have automated reply systems or web chat. All messages are read manually and responded to as capacity allows. 🔁 Replies may not originate from samara@AdministrativeErasure.org. For safety and deliverability, responses may come from a separate secure address.

You're exactly who this project is for.

Administrative Genocide: Trump’s Blueprint for Erasing Trans Lives

Administrative Genocide: Trans Erasure Under Trump

(Fully Sourced, Deeply Expanded Analysis)

“Genocide does not always begin with ovens. Sometimes it begins with subpoenas, executive orders, and lifelines severed by budget lines.”

“These policies meet conditions under the UN Genocide Convention—targeted destruction of identity, denial of medical care, and conditions of life designed to cause bodily and mental harm.” enter image description here

🗓️ Timeline & Federal Executive Assault

✨ Pre‑October 2024 Build‑Up Well before Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025, several federal agencies began executing quiet shifts toward institutional erasure. The CDC, NIH, and HHS systematically removed references to gender identity and transgender-inclusive language from public-facing materials. This bureaucratic rollback signaled not just ideological repositioning but logistical groundwork for future policy denial. Erasure did not begin with a bang, but with the subtle deletion of data, terms, and affirmations of existence. These moves primed the landscape for executive orders to follow, allowing federal departments to deny care and recognition to trans individuals without first having to justify sudden reversals of existing language or precedent.

🕛 Jan 20, 2025 – EO 14168: “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism”

This executive order was the cornerstone of the new administration’s legal assault on gender diversity. By declaring sex to be biologically binary and immutable, EO 14168 did more than restrict terminology. It created a judicial standard by which all future federal decisions would be evaluated. The Department of Justice was directed to re-evaluate the scope and application of Bostock v. Clayton County, the landmark 2020 SCOTUS ruling that extended Title VII protections to LGBTQ+ individuals. EO 14168's ripple effect was immediate: federal agencies ceased internal DEI training, scrubbed inclusive language from health and education policies, and rewrote official documents to eliminate any trace of nonbinary or transgender recognition. The Department of Defense followed suit by issuing a memo enforcing a binary-only policy for personnel files and base policy.

🕛 Jan 27, 2025 – EO 14183: “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness”

This executive order institutionalized a total ban on transgender and nonbinary individuals in the U.S. military. Although reminiscent of Trump’s 2017 Twitter announcement, EO 14183 was more structured and legally entrenched. It framed trans service as inherently incompatible with discipline, readiness, and “military honor.” This justification recast transgender identity not merely as a challenge to logistics or cost but as a character flaw undermining the armed forces. The impact was chilling. Thousands of active and reserve service members were forced into review, redeployment, or discharge. Those previously protected under Biden-era policy found their military careers abruptly imperiled. The ban's framing served as a bellwether for other institutions: if the military could purge based on gender identity, so too could federal contractors, civilian agencies, and law enforcement academies.

🕛 Jan 28, 2025 – EO 14187: “Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation”

EO 14187 escalated the erasure into overt demonization. By labeling gender-affirming medical care as “chemical and surgical mutilation,” the administration weaponized language to criminalize care and stigmatize both patients and providers. The order compelled HHS, CDC, and NIH to rescind funding streams to any institution offering gender-affirming care for minors. The chilling effect was swift: clinics began preemptively halting treatments, nonprofit hospitals paused programs, and academic research tied to trans health lost federal grants. The use of charged language also justified civil and criminal investigations into providers, setting the stage for DOJ subpoenas and politically motivated raids.

🏛️ Supreme Court Rulings (May–June 2025)

United States v. Skrmetti (June 18, 2025) In a 6–3 ruling, SCOTUS upheld Tennessee's ban on puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender minors, signaling a new era in federal jurisprudence. The decision deployed "rational basis review" instead of strict scrutiny, a legal move that diminished the constitutional standing of trans healthcare. This case marked a regression from Bostock, narrowing the application of equal protection. By framing gender-affirming care as controversial or experimental, the Court allowed states to legislate it out of existence. The ruling emboldened 20+ states to double down on their own bans. Sotomayor's dissent warned of "a constitutional death knell for bodily autonomy in marginalized youth."

United States v. Shilling (May 6, 2025) This case reinstated the military ban by vacating a lower court injunction. It effectively upheld EO 14183 and blessed its logic of exclusion. Legal scholars noted that Shilling established precedent not merely for the military, but for any federal context where “readiness” or “discipline” might be invoked to justify anti-trans exclusion. Together, these two rulings provided legal scaffolding for institutional bigotry—a Supreme Court-backed architecture of exclusion.

🏥 Medical Infrastructure Under Siege

Children’s National Hospital (DC) Under threat of federal scrutiny, Children’s National publicly announced that it would halt hormone prescriptions and puberty blockers for minors by August 30, 2025. Internal sources cited DOJ subpoena threats and legal liability under EO 14187. This closure represents a domino in the chain of institutional collapse, as once-trusted pillars of pediatric care abandon the communities they once served. Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) CHLA's gender clinic will shut its doors July 22, 2025, citing federal funding uncertainty. The center once served thousands of youth in Southern California, and its closure marks a brutal loss of regional access to life-saving care. Parents of trans youth report being told to "seek mental health stabilization in lieu of transition care." Broader National Context

Seattle Children’s, Phoenix Children’s, and UPMC are among several major hospitals now “pausing” gender-affirming services for youth. Over 20 institutions received subpoenas or pressure letters. This federal intimidation campaign has caused mass retreat across the pediatric care landscape. 📉 Community Safety & Mental Health Undermined 988 LGBTQ+ Lifeline Elimination (July 17, 2025) The shutdown of the "Press 3" line for LGBTQ+ youth removed a vital mental health pipeline for nearly 1.3 million callers annually. Queer youth, often already isolated and denied familial support, now face even greater crisis with fewer safe outlets. Mental health professionals called the move "state-enabled abandonment." The administration framed the decision as a budgetary necessity, but internal documents suggest it was part of a broader dismantling of queer-specific federal programs.

Veterans Affairs Rollbacks

The VA stripped Pride flags from its facilities, dismantled its DEI programs, and removed nondiscrimination clauses. These changes not only affect trans veterans, but send a chilling message to all queer service members and staff: your existence is no longer institutionally safe.

⚖️ State-Level Legislative Erosion

By mid-2025, over 575 anti-LGBTQ+ bills had been introduced nationwide, with at least 54 enacted into law. Over half targeted identity documents, school policies, healthcare, or bathroom access. Puerto Rico also passed its own gender-care ban, exposing the reach of this movement beyond the continental U.S.

States used the Supreme Court rulings as green lights. Governors referenced Skrmetti and Shilling as justification for aggressive enforcement and funding cuts. Trans youth and their families became nomads, fleeing states in search of safety and medical access.

📊 Human Toll & Activist Resistance

Mental Health Crisis Reports from KFF and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups document skyrocketing rates of suicidal ideation, depression, and disassociation among trans youth. Social withdrawal, academic collapse, and self-harm behaviors have surged in regions where care access has vanished.

Youth-Led Protests Young people led marches across cities, chanting "We won’t go quietly" and "Trans kids are done begging." In D.C., students walked out of class en masse. At Stanford, med students defied administrators by holding teach-ins on gender care. Their message: survival is resistance.

Legal Pushback Lambda Legal, GLAD, ACLU, and PFLAG launched coordinated lawsuits, securing temporary injunctions in a handful of states. New York and California AGs have publicly ordered clinics not to comply with federal gag orders. Legal scholars predict escalating conflict between blue states and federal enforcers.

🏦 Administrative Genocide: The Legal Framework of Erasure

What distinguishes this wave of repression is not brute force, but bureaucratic precision. The Trump administration's program of trans erasure meets the criteria outlined in the UN Genocide Convention: Bodily and Mental Harm: Through medical denial, mental health dismantling, and criminalization of providers. Destruction of Identity: Via executive orders nullifying legal gender identity.

Targeted Conditions of Life: By rendering healthcare, documentation, and institutional belonging inaccessible. This is not genocide by bullet or gas. It is genocide by statute, policy, and silence. It is administrative genocide—cold, legalistic, and strategic.

📊 Human Toll & Activist Resistance

Mental Health Crisis Reports from KFF and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups document skyrocketing rates of suicidal ideation, depression, and disassociation among trans youth. Social withdrawal, academic collapse, and self-harm behaviors have surged in regions where care access has vanished.

Youth-Led Protests Young people led marches across cities, chanting "We won’t go quietly" and "Trans kids are done begging." In D.C., students walked out of class en masse. At Stanford, med students defied administrators by holding teach-ins on gender care. Their message: survival is resistance. Legal Pushback Lambda Legal, GLAD, ACLU, and PFLAG launched coordinated lawsuits, securing temporary injunctions in a handful of states. New York and California AGs have publicly ordered clinics not to comply with federal gag orders. Legal scholars predict escalating conflict between blue states and federal enforcers.

🏦 Administrative Genocide: The Legal Framework of Erasure

What distinguishes this wave of repression is not brute force, but bureaucratic precision. The Trump administration's program of trans erasure meets the criteria outlined in the UN Genocide Convention: Bodily and Mental Harm: Through medical denial, mental health dismantling, and criminalization of providers. Destruction of Identity: Via executive orders nullifying legal gender identity.

Targeted Conditions of Life: By rendering healthcare, documentation, and institutional belonging inaccessible. This is not genocide by bullet or gas. It is genocide by statute, policy, and silence. It is administrative genocide—cold, legalistic, and strategic.

🔧 Call to Action

The mechanisms of harm have been mapped. The pattern is undeniable. It is now up to the public, the courts, and trans allies to dismantle this administrative architecture before it calcifies. What you can do: Support and amplify lawsuits filed by Lambda Legal, ACLU, and GLAD Contact your state AG and demand noncompliance with EO-enforced erasure Donate to trans healthcare funds and legal defense networks Share survivor stories, especially from impacted youth Publicly label this what it is: genocide by bureaucracy History will not forgive those who stayed silent.

📆 Interactive Timeline Module (Oct 2024 → July 2025)

Key Events: Oct–Dec 2024: Federal scrub of inclusive language Jan 20, 2025: EO 14168 issued Jan 27, 2025: EO 14183 issued Jan 28, 2025: EO 14187 issued May 6, 2025: SCOTUS Shilling decision June 18, 2025: SCOTUS Skrmetti decision July 17, 2025: Shutdown of 988 LGBTQ line July 22, 2025: CHLA clinic closes Aug 30, 2025: Children’s National ends care

🔗 Full Reference Links

EO 14168 – Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_14168

EO 14183 – Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_14183

EO 14187 – Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation (cross-referenced under EO 14168): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_14168

United States v. Skrmetti – SCOTUS Opinion (PDF): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-477_2cp3.pdf

United States v. Skrmetti – Case Overview via SCOTUSBlog: https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/united-states-v-skrmetti/

Skrmetti Ruling Impact – KFF Policy Watch: https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/what-are-the-implications-of-the-skrmetti-ruling-for-minors-access-to-gender-affirming-care/

United States v. Shilling (Talbott) – GLAD Legal Summary: https://www.gladlaw.org/cases/talbott-v-usa/

Shilling Context – The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/05/08/transgender-troops-hegseth-trump-supreme-court/

Children’s National Hospital Ends Gender Care – The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/07/18/children-national-ends-gender-transition-care/

CHLA Clinic Closure Announcement – AP News: https://apnews.com/article/34d27684692c95b4f7c3266c55a71d38

National Anti-LGBTQ Legal Trends – Wikipedia Overview: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020s_anti-LGBTQ_movement_in_the_United_States

988 “Press 3” Shutdown Coverage – them.us: https://www.them.us/story/lgbtq-youth-lost-lifeline-988-shutdown-interviews

988 Hotline Shutdown Reaction (Jim Parsons) – The Daily Beast: https://www.thedailybeast.com/hollywood-star-jim-parsons-calls-out-trump-for-hurtful-move/

VA Discrimination Rollbacks – The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/18/veterans-affairs-agency-anti-discrimination-protections

Lambda Legal FAQ on Skrmetti: https://lambdalegal.org/us-v-skrmetti-faq

GLAD Legal Actions and Case Files: https://www.gladlaw.org/cases/talbott-v-usa/

Opening and Closing Statement – Dorn v. UCH,et. al. (Also Fet. AI Haters Rebuttal)

This is not a closing. This is a charge.
In this final statement, Samara Dorn doesn’t just summarize a case—she detonates it.
The courtroom was silent. The algorithms weren’t.

Listen now. Hear what they tried to bury.
(Also features excerpts from THE AI HATERS REBUTTAL.)

☢️ Closing Statement – Dorn v. UnitedHealthcare

This is not a conclusion—it’s ignition. Samara Dorn delivers a final blow in the battle against healthcare profiling, metadata weaponization, and transgender erasure. This statement is part of the broader narrative, also featured in THE AI HATERS REBUTTAL.

🎧 Listen to the Opening Statement in Webamp Player

📄 Below is the actual transcript from the Complaint

  • Opening Statement: pages 2–4
  • Closing Statement: pages 146–148

📢 OPENING STATEMENT

“What is done cannot be undone, but one can prevent it happening again.” — Anne Frank.

“My silence will not protect me.” — Audre Lorde.

“On the first day, we will revoke Joe Biden’s cruel policies on transgender treatments...” — Donald J. Trump, October 16, 2024.

“Gender ideology is a cult...” — Senator J.D. Vance, March 2024.

This is not a privacy case. This is not a civil dispute. This is a reckoning.

The Defendants—UnitedHealthcare of Colorado, Inc. and Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization, Inc.—knowingly and unlawfully disclosed the Plaintiff’s PHI to law enforcement without a warrant, subpoena, or HIPAA-authorized exception.

What did they hand over? Her gender identity. Her surgical history. Her psychiatric diagnoses. Her medications. Audio recordings of her lawful but distressed calls. And most chilling of all—their own narrative framing her as a national security threat.

They invoked Homeland Security. When that failed, they turned to the Grand Junction Police Department.

Why? Because she said three words—“Deny. Defend. Depose.”—a legal critique, twisted into a threat. They fabricated meaning. They gave police the script. They turned protected speech into surveillance. They didn’t wait for a judge. This wasn’t a glitch. It was policy in action.

They did this knowing the political climate: A presidential frontrunner calling for trans erasure. A culture of fear. And instead of resisting, they complied. They helped.

The First Amendment doesn’t require politeness. It protects protest.
The Fourth doesn’t excuse profiling. It prohibits warrantless search and seizure.
The Fourteenth doesn’t allow discrimination. It guarantees equal protection.

This wasn’t just illegal. It was a message—to every other trans person:

Don’t raise your voice. Or we’ll disappear you, too.

Surveillance becomes isolation. Isolation becomes disappearance. Disappearance becomes death.

Gulags began with clerks. Gas chambers began with intake forms. Genocide begins with paperwork.

And genocide always—always—begins with bureaucrats doing their job.

“How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world.” — Anne Frank

This complaint is that moment.

This is not just legal. This is moral.
This is a declaration: We will not be flagged. We will not be profiled. We will not be erased.

Her records were hers. Her voice was hers. Her truth is still here.

The Plaintiff survived. She speaks. And she is not alone.


⚖️ CLOSING STATEMENT

There is no justice in waiting 35 days to reframe a medication request into a threat profile. There is no emergency. There was no escalation. No clinical call. Just strategic silence—and then retaliation.

Their own employee admitted it: “I’m not supposed to do this…”

And yet she did. She hit send. 35 days after the fact.

No crisis. No urgency. Just a calculated delivery of a packet to the police: audio files, identity, meds, surgical history—packaged with a quote: “I kinda mean what I say.”

That sentence—uttered in desperation, not violence—has become their excuse.

But it wasn’t a threat. It was a cry for help.

And they knew it. Because they sat on it for 35 days. Debated liability. And still chose erasure.

This wasn’t care. It was a bureaucratic hit job.

They punished speech. Criminalized gender. Created a false police record. And hoped the Plaintiff would disappear before this lawsuit could ever be filed.

But she didn’t.

She stood up. She filed. And she forced them to face what they did.

This Court is not just about contracts. It is the firewall against administrative cruelty disguised as care.

Five calls. Thirty-five days of silence. One irrevocable breach.

The law must mean more than permission to harm. It must mean protection for the already harmed.

Opening and Closing Statement – Dorn v. UCH,et. al. (Also Fet. AI Haters Rebuttal)

This is not a closing. This is a charge.
In this final statement, Samara Dorn doesn’t just summarize a case—she detonates it.
The courtroom was silent. The algorithms weren’t.

Listen now. Hear what they tried to bury.
(Also features excerpts from THE AI HATERS REBUTTAL.)

☢️ Closing Statement – Dorn v. UnitedHealthcare

This is not a conclusion—it’s ignition. Samara Dorn delivers a final blow in the battle against healthcare profiling, metadata weaponization, and transgender erasure. This statement is part of the broader narrative, also featured in THE AI HATERS REBUTTAL.

🎧 Listen to the Opening Statement in Webamp Player

📄 Below is the actual transcript from the Complaint

  • Opening Statement: pages 2–4
  • Closing Statement: pages 146–148

📢 OPENING STATEMENT

“What is done cannot be undone, but one can prevent it happening again.” — Anne Frank.

“My silence will not protect me.” — Audre Lorde.

“On the first day, we will revoke Joe Biden’s cruel policies on transgender treatments...” — Donald J. Trump, October 16, 2024.

“Gender ideology is a cult...” — Senator J.D. Vance, March 2024.

This is not a privacy case. This is not a civil dispute. This is a reckoning.

The Defendants—UnitedHealthcare of Colorado, Inc. and Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization, Inc.—knowingly and unlawfully disclosed the Plaintiff’s PHI to law enforcement without a warrant, subpoena, or HIPAA-authorized exception.

What did they hand over? Her gender identity. Her surgical history. Her psychiatric diagnoses. Her medications. Audio recordings of her lawful but distressed calls. And most chilling of all—their own narrative framing her as a national security threat.

They invoked Homeland Security. When that failed, they turned to the Grand Junction Police Department.

Why? Because she said three words—“Deny. Defend. Depose.”—a legal critique, twisted into a threat. They fabricated meaning. They gave police the script. They turned protected speech into surveillance. They didn’t wait for a judge. This wasn’t a glitch. It was policy in action.

They did this knowing the political climate: A presidential frontrunner calling for trans erasure. A culture of fear. And instead of resisting, they complied. They helped.

The First Amendment doesn’t require politeness. It protects protest.
The Fourth doesn’t excuse profiling. It prohibits warrantless search and seizure.
The Fourteenth doesn’t allow discrimination. It guarantees equal protection.

This wasn’t just illegal. It was a message—to every other trans person:

Don’t raise your voice. Or we’ll disappear you, too.

Surveillance becomes isolation. Isolation becomes disappearance. Disappearance becomes death.

Gulags began with clerks. Gas chambers began with intake forms. Genocide begins with paperwork.

And genocide always—always—begins with bureaucrats doing their job.

“How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world.” — Anne Frank

This complaint is that moment.

This is not just legal. This is moral.
This is a declaration: We will not be flagged. We will not be profiled. We will not be erased.

Her records were hers. Her voice was hers. Her truth is still here.

The Plaintiff survived. She speaks. And she is not alone.


⚖️ CLOSING STATEMENT

There is no justice in waiting 35 days to reframe a medication request into a threat profile. There is no emergency. There was no escalation. No clinical call. Just strategic silence—and then retaliation.

Their own employee admitted it: “I’m not supposed to do this…”

And yet she did. She hit send. 35 days after the fact.

No crisis. No urgency. Just a calculated delivery of a packet to the police: audio files, identity, meds, surgical history—packaged with a quote: “I kinda mean what I say.”

That sentence—uttered in desperation, not violence—has become their excuse.

But it wasn’t a threat. It was a cry for help.

And they knew it. Because they sat on it for 35 days. Debated liability. And still chose erasure.

This wasn’t care. It was a bureaucratic hit job.

They punished speech. Criminalized gender. Created a false police record. And hoped the Plaintiff would disappear before this lawsuit could ever be filed.

But she didn’t.

She stood up. She filed. And she forced them to face what they did.

This Court is not just about contracts. It is the firewall against administrative cruelty disguised as care.

Five calls. Thirty-five days of silence. One irrevocable breach.

The law must mean more than permission to harm. It must mean protection for the already harmed.

✉️ Contact Us

✉️ Contact Us
We hear you. We believe in corporate and government accountability. We are not afraid.

If you have questions, media inquiries, legal interest, or want to share your own story of administrative erasure, reach out:

📬 Email
samara@AdministrativeErasure.org
All messages go directly to the site's founder. Expect a human reply—not a system.

📣 Press & Media
Journalists, researchers, and civil rights allies:
💡 Include “PRESS” in your subject line for priority handling.

🕵️ Whistleblowers
💥 If you have information about healthcare surveillance, AI escalation systems, or data misuse inside institutions like UnitedHealthcare, you are welcome here.
You can email securely or request a Signal contact for encrypted messaging.

🌱 Survivors & Community
If you're a trans person, Medicaid recipient, or marginalized community member affected by healthcare injustice, this platform is for you.
You're not alone—and you deserve more than silence. ✊🏽

🚨 Legal Inquiries
Law firms or watchdog groups wishing to review exhibits, metadata, or case materials may request access by email.
🗃️ Include “LEGAL REVIEW REQUEST” in your subject line.

📌 Note
This site does not currently have automated reply systems or web chat. All messages are read manually and responded to as capacity allows.
🔁 Replies may not originate from samara@AdministrativeErasure.org. For safety and deliverability, responses may come from a separate secure address.

"> ');